| Abstract |
This study explores the indigenous justice systems of Jirga and Panchayat, examining their similarities, differences, and their implications for justice delivery in their respective communities. The objective of this research is to shed light on the functioning, structure, and effectiveness of the Jirga and Panchayat systems, and to compare and contrast their key features, including their composition, decision-making processes, enforcement mechanisms, and adherence to human rights standards. By conducting a comparative analysis of these two indigenous justice systems, this study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of their strengths, weaknesses, and potential for reform. The research methodology includes an extensive review of existing literature, scholarly articles, and reports related to Jirga and Panchayat systems, as well as primary data collection through interviews with community members, elders, legal practitioners, and human rights advocates who have experience with or insights into these systems. The data will be analyzed qualitatively to identify patterns, trends, and areas of divergence between the Jirga and Panchayat systems. The findings of this study will provide a comprehensive analysis of the strengths and limitations of the Jirga and Panchayat systems, and their compatibility with international human rights standards and principles of justice. Furthermore, the research aims to identify potential areas for reform and improvement in these indigenous justice systems, while considering their cultural significance and community acceptance. The findings will serve as a valuable resource for policymakers, legal practitioners, and scholars interested in understanding and engaging with indigenous justice systems and their implications for justice, human rights, and social cohesion.
Keywords: Indigenous Justice System, Jirga, Panchayat, Traditional Dispute Resolution, Indigenous Governance.
|
|---|
