s

About Academy  |  About IRBAS  |    Contact Us                                                                   ISSN (Online) : 2308-7056 | ISSN (Print) : 2710-0065

International Review of Basic
and Applied Sciences (IRBAS)

Home     Editorial Board     Current Issue     Archive     Indexing      Call for papers     Authors Guideline      Manuscript Submission      Contact

News & Events

Tuesday, April 01, 2025
IRBAS Volume 13, Issue 2 has been published.
  
Tuesday, April 01, 2025
IRBAS Volume 13, Issue 3, Quarter III of 2025 will publish in Jul-Aug 2025.
  
Monday, October 16, 2023
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized for the year 2023-2024
  
Saturday, December 03, 2022
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized in Category Y from 1st July 2022 till 30th June 2023.
  
Friday, August 06, 2021
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized in Category Y from 1st July 2021 till 30th June 2022.
  
Thursday, September 10, 2020
IRBAS Published on Quarterly basis from Volume 8.
  
Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Recruitment of Reviewers. Reviewers name and affiliation will be listed on the IRBAS journals webpage.
  

IRBAS Citation Report

  All Since 2025
 Citation  308 18
 h-index 10 01
 i10-index 11 01

Hit Counter

Total
Today's
Yesterday's

 Country Wise Counter

Academy Publication Ethics


Paper Details
Title

A Comparative Study of Synchronous and Asynchronous Remote Usability Testing Methods

AuthorsAHMED S. ALGHAMDI, ALI H. AL-BADI, ROOBAEA ALROOBAEA and PAM J. MAYHEW
Abstract

Traditional in-lab usability testing has long been the standard method for evaluating and improving the usability of software interfaces. In-lab testing, though effective, has its drawbacks such as unavailability of representative end-users, high testing costs, and the difficulty of reproducing a user‟s everyday environment. To overcome these issues, various alternative usability evaluation methods (UEMs) have been developed over the past two decades. One of the most commonly used is the remote usability testing method. Ever since remote usability testing was introduced fourteen years ago, its effectiveness has been judged and evaluated against that of traditional in-lab testing. However, there is a distinct lack of research exploring the effectiveness of the various modes of remote usability testing. This research aimed to conduct a comparative study of two types of remote usability testing methods namely: synchronous and asynchronous remote usability testing. These two methods were compared through an evaluation of a website, which involved three points of comparison: number and type of problems discovered, overall task performance, and test participants‟ satisfaction. The results of the study showed that the synchronous testing method performed better than the asynchronous testing method in terms of the number and types of usability problems discovered, although no statistical significant differences were found. The participants in the synchronous test were notably more successful than the participants in the asynchronous test in completing the test tasks. However, the asynchronous test participants were significantly quicker than synchronous participants in performing those tasks. Participants in the synchronous tests also scored slightly higher satisfaction rate with regards to the targeted website. However, asynchronous participants were considerably more satisfied with the remote method that they had participated in. The paper concludes with a set of recommendations for conducting such research.
Keywords: Usability testing, Remote usability testing, Synchronous and Asynchronous remote usability testing.

Volume 1
Issue August
Pages 61-97
File Name Download (1097)
AUN

Copyright © www.academyirmbr.com : 2012-25. All Rights Reserved.