s

About Academy  |  About IRBAS  |    Contact Us                                                                   ISSN (Online) : 2308-7056 | ISSN (Print) : 2710-0065

International Review of Basic
and Applied Sciences (IRBAS)

Home     Editorial Board     Current Issue     Archive     Indexing      Call for papers     Authors Guideline      Manuscript Submission      Contact

News & Events

Saturday, December 20, 2025
IRBAS Volume 13, Issue 4 has been published.
  
Saturday, December 20, 2025
IRBAS Volume 14, Issue 1, Quarter I of 2026 will publish in Jan-Mar 2026.
  
Monday, October 16, 2023
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized for the year 2023-2024
  
Saturday, December 03, 2022
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized in Category Y from 1st July 2022 till 30th June 2023.
  
Friday, August 06, 2021
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized in Category Y from 1st July 2021 till 30th June 2022.
  
Thursday, September 10, 2020
IRBAS Published on Quarterly basis from Volume 8.
  
Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Recruitment of Reviewers. Reviewers name and affiliation will be listed on the IRBAS journals webpage.
  

IRBAS Citation Report

  All Since 2026
 Citation  324 21
 h-index 11 01
 i10-index 12 01

Hit Counter

Total 1084108
Today's 441
Yesterday's 1040

 Country Wise Counter

Academy Publication Ethics


IRBAS Paper Details

← Back to Volume 10, July 2022 issue

Title Gender Disparity Among Secondary School Teachers in Formative Assessment Practices During Classroom Instruction
AuthorsKIFAYAT KHAN, ABDUR RAHEEM and HALEEMA BIBI
Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the gender disparity in teachers’ formative assessment practices during classroom instruction at the secondary school level. It was a survey research design. Four hundred (400) teachers were chosen as a sample of this research via stratified random sampling techniques from the Haripur district. These teachers were divided into two (2) strata of male and female such that each group consisted of 200 teachers. To attain the objectives, two (2) null hypotheses were established. A questionnaire with a reliability coefficient of 0.97 was utilized to gather data from the participants. The data gathered were examined through statistical tools. Majority of the teachers disagreed about using the learning target and monitoring strategy of formative assessment, and more than 40% of the teachers disagreed about using self-assessment and peer assessment. However, about 40% of the teachers were in favor of using feedback assessment in their classroom instruction. Further, male teachers were found better than female schoolteachers in using formative assessment strategies during classroom instruction. Inservice teachers’ training may be organized to bridge the gaps between the teachers for using formative assessment in classroom instruction and further research studies may be conducted on other aspects of formative assessment.
Keywords: Formative Assessment Strategies, Learning Targets, Monitoring, Feedback, Self-Assessment, Peer Assessment.

Volume 10
Issue July
Pages 45-57
Download Download PDF (315 downloads)
AUN

1670828704

Copyright © www.academyirmbr.com : 2012-25. All Rights Reserved.