s

About Academy  |  About IRBAS  |    Contact Us                                                                   ISSN (Online) : 2308-7056 | ISSN (Print) : 2710-0065

International Review of Basic
and Applied Sciences (IRBAS)

Home     Editorial Board     Current Issue     Archive     Indexing      Call for papers     Authors Guideline      Manuscript Submission      Contact

News & Events

Saturday, December 20, 2025
IRBAS Volume 13, Issue 4 has been published.
  
Saturday, December 20, 2025
IRBAS Volume 14, Issue 1, Quarter I of 2026 will publish in Jan-Mar 2026.
  
Monday, October 16, 2023
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized for the year 2023-2024
  
Saturday, December 03, 2022
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized in Category Y from 1st July 2022 till 30th June 2023.
  
Friday, August 06, 2021
IRBAS is now HEC Recognized in Category Y from 1st July 2021 till 30th June 2022.
  
Thursday, September 10, 2020
IRBAS Published on Quarterly basis from Volume 8.
  
Tuesday, January 17, 2017
Recruitment of Reviewers. Reviewers name and affiliation will be listed on the IRBAS journals webpage.
  

IRBAS Citation Report

  All Since 2026
 Citation  324 21
 h-index 11 01
 i10-index 12 01

Hit Counter

Total 1083988
Today's 321
Yesterday's 1040

 Country Wise Counter

Academy Publication Ethics


IRBAS Paper Details

← Back to Volume 10, January 2022 issue

Title Evaluation of Single and Dual Platforms for CD4 and CD8 T-Lymphocyte Count among HIV Patients
AuthorsHAYTHAM DAHLAWI
Abstract

HIV is a major problem worldwide affecting thousands of people each year. CD4 T cells and CD8 T cells counts are important factors for assessment immune system and monitoring and management immune status of HIV-infected people. The main methodologies available for absolute CD4 T cells and CD8 T cells analysis are the dual-platform and single-platform. Studies demonstrated grater performance by singleplatform method laboratories on percentage of T-cell subset percentage for accuracy and measurements for precision However, some dual-platform method laboratories outperformed all single-platform method laboratories on percentages of T-cell subset in other studies. Therefore, the goal of this study is to identify whether or not it is necessary to change from dual-platform to single-platform techniques by determine the variation of relative counts for CD4 T cells and CD8 T cells Data set consists of 85 HIV patients have been studies. Two methods have been compared to indicate CD4 T cells to CD8 T cells counts, dual-platform method using hematology analyzer to estimate absolute lymphocyte count and the percentage of CD4 T cells among lymphocytes obtained from flow cytometry and single-platform method enables absolute CD4 T cell counts to be measured by flow cytometry directly. This study showed statistically significant differences between the single-platform and dual-platform technology in favor of single-platform. The percentage of differences in CD4 and CD8 values between methods were 8% and 10% and somehow similar trend was noticed for each of CD4 single- and dual-platform as well as CD8 single- and dualplatform when it comes to parallel coordinates comparisons. Our study suggesting a major disadvantage of dual-platform method might be error in each independent measurement affecting each following step in the T- cell calculation values. While high precision in single-platform method is due to depending only on performance of one measurement. However, further investigations and studies are required to compare the accuracy and precision of both techniques.
Keywords: Patients, HIV, CD4 T Cells, CD8 T Cells, Dual-platform, Single-platform.

Volume 10
Issue January
Pages 63-71
Download Download PDF (257 downloads)
AUN

1644586137

Copyright © www.academyirmbr.com : 2012-25. All Rights Reserved.