iz

Performance, reuse, and high change costs are all issues that traditional approaches have dealt with successfully. Due to advancements in technology, projects are getting more complex and dynamic, offering new problems for development organisations in terms of adapting agile approaches to meet their requirements. Development; Quality Assurance; Testing; Planning, Risk Assessment, Designing, and Modeling. As a result, there are challenges at every stage of the SDLC. Agile was originally intended for short projects. Its usefulness prompted enterprises to organizations large scale software development. Managing large-scale agile projects can also be challenging. Software metrics analyze the overall health of the development process. Despite its benefits, practitioners do not employ SDLC measurements, which adversely effects on the quality of product. The findings of proposed agile framework illustrate new hybrid, customized agile methodologies that resolve the generated challenges about quality of the product. Metrics are used in the majority of the recommended framework's effective practices. The framework's effectiveness is demonstrated by an industrial-scale project and a published case study. The extent of the work that can be done with these frameworks and methodologies is much broader. Testing frameworks that produce better results than Test-Driven Development (TDD) do as well. The findings lend validity to the framework that has been proposed. Any firm can benefit from the proposed framework, which can help them save time, effort, and money while still producing a high-quality product.

Keywords: Time and Cost, Hybrid Agile Framework, Quality Product, Risk Assessment, Metrics.